Britain’s Oldest Defence and Security Institute Confirms that BNP is Right
Fri, 27/08/2010 - 11:30 | BNP News
Britain’s oldest defence and security research think tank, the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), has confirmed that the British National Party has been correct all along with its claim that Labour/Tory foreign policy is a major cause of terrorism in Britain today.
RUSI, founded in 1831 by the Duke of Wellington, said in an article in its latest journal that “home-grown terrorism in the UK is growing” partly due to a “foreign policy that serves to focus alienation and resentment.”
The BNP has long argued that there are two primary causes of terrorism in Britain today: mass immigration, which has created a large Third World population pool from which radical Islamists can recruit; and British foreign policy which provides an excuse for Islamists to whip up hatred against Britain.
In the article, titled “Terrorism: The New Wave,” RUSI authors Michael Clarke and Valentina Soria said that in the five years “since the 7/7 London bomb attacks and almost a decade after the 9/11 attacks in the United States, the jihadist terror threat from violent extremists has evolved in significant ways, particularly as it affects the United Kingdom.”
The authors go on to state that the radicalisation of Muslims in British prisons could produce hundreds of home-grown terrorists as the UK faces threats from lone bombers and assassins.
“Large-scale co-ordinated attacks are being replaced by highly-motivated but poorly trained individuals operating with the expectation that eventually one will succeed.”
According to the experts, Britain has more to fear than any other western country from home-grown terrorists and the conditions are all there for a series of attacks to begin at any time.
“Estimates showed one in 10 of the 8,000 Muslim prisoners in high-security institutions in England and Wales were ‘successfully targeted’ by radical jihadists.
“Perhaps some 800 potentially violent radicals, not previously guilty of terrorism charges, will be back in society over the coming five to 10 years," they wrote.
"The natural reaction to improved counter-terrorist operations is for jihadist attacks to evolve towards more individual efforts."
They added that "a powerful al-Qaida media campaign" would make them "appear as dramatic and threatening as earlier attacks".
"If lone bombers and assassins are being sent out to try their luck... the key variable will be the effect these lone or spontaneous attempts have on the motivation of others to join the jihad," they said.
"Lone killers will always exist and some of them will succeed. The key question is whether their acts remain that of individuals or become part of a structural phenomenon."
Under a new generation of leaders such as Anwar Al-Awlaki, considered one of the world's most wanted terrorists, "it appears that high motivation is followed by fairly rudimentary training", the authors wrote, pointing to the apparent lone bomber behind the Times Square car bomb in New York in May.
While the chances of success for a lone, poorly trained individual may be considerably lower, "eventually, it is reasoned, one of them will be lucky enough to succeed in a major way against high-profile targets in Western countries".
The Rusi report went on: "The possibility of attacks now hangs over all major sporting events from the Commonwealth Games in India and the 2012 Olympic Games in London, to all future signature events such as football World Cup tournaments."
For the British public, it warned, the "greatest danger is public complacency".
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Sunday, August 1, 2010
New Figures Prove Invasion “Via the Womb” Remains Biggest Threat to Britain’s Homogeneity
New Figures Prove Invasion “Via the Womb” Remains Biggest Threat to Britain’s Homogeneity
Thu, 29/07/2010 - 14:55 | BNP News
The spiralling birth rate of Third World immigrants already in Britain remains one of the single greatest threats to this nation’s continued existence as a majority First World nation, new figures from the Communities Department have shown.
The figures, released in writing to Parliament by department spokesman Andrew Stunell, showed that “at current birth rates and expected rates of immigration,” 252,000 new homes a year will be needed each year until 2031 to accommodate the growth in Britain’s population.
Of these, 36,000 will be needed because there will be more people living alone and fewer couples and families, and 116,000 because of rising birth rates.
The remaining 100,000 will be needed to house migrants, based on 2006 population figures.
In other words, even if there is a slowdown in immigration rates, the birth rates of immigrants already present is placing a greater strain on housing than new immigration.
Mr Stunell’s statement said that four out of every ten new houses or flats built to cope with the rising population will go to a migrant.
“It is estimated that net international migration could account, on average, for 40 per cent of the net growth of households in England over the projection period from 2006 to 2031.”
Previous figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that legal Third World immigrants made up 14.7 percent (7.5 million) of the population of England in 2004.
This figure is, of course, already nearly seven years out of date. With legal immigration currently running at in excess of 500,000 per year, the Third World immigration population will have increased by at least another 3.5 million since 2004, making a more accurate figure about 11 million.
Other ONS figures released last year showed that 10.9 percent (or 6.7 million) of the currently resident population of Britain were not born in this country.
In 2005, the ONS issued a separate report which said that 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British.”
This 2005 birth rate figure does not include births to second and third generation immigrant mothers.
Figures released by the ONS in January 2009 revealed that the Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years. Their population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society.
An August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.
The majority of the “new immigrants” are not from Eastern Europe, as is often widely claimed. According to the ONS figures, immigrants from Eastern Europe had 25,000 children in Britain last year — an absolute minority of the just over 700,000 live births.
Once again, the statistical evidence is clear: unless immigration is not only halted but reversed, it will just be a question of time before Britain is overrun by an invasion via the womb.
Only the British National Party dares to point this truth out, and only the BNP has the sensible, humane and just policies to avoid Britain turning into a cross between India and Nigeria.
Thu, 29/07/2010 - 14:55 | BNP News
The spiralling birth rate of Third World immigrants already in Britain remains one of the single greatest threats to this nation’s continued existence as a majority First World nation, new figures from the Communities Department have shown.
The figures, released in writing to Parliament by department spokesman Andrew Stunell, showed that “at current birth rates and expected rates of immigration,” 252,000 new homes a year will be needed each year until 2031 to accommodate the growth in Britain’s population.
Of these, 36,000 will be needed because there will be more people living alone and fewer couples and families, and 116,000 because of rising birth rates.
The remaining 100,000 will be needed to house migrants, based on 2006 population figures.
In other words, even if there is a slowdown in immigration rates, the birth rates of immigrants already present is placing a greater strain on housing than new immigration.
Mr Stunell’s statement said that four out of every ten new houses or flats built to cope with the rising population will go to a migrant.
“It is estimated that net international migration could account, on average, for 40 per cent of the net growth of households in England over the projection period from 2006 to 2031.”
Previous figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that legal Third World immigrants made up 14.7 percent (7.5 million) of the population of England in 2004.
This figure is, of course, already nearly seven years out of date. With legal immigration currently running at in excess of 500,000 per year, the Third World immigration population will have increased by at least another 3.5 million since 2004, making a more accurate figure about 11 million.
Other ONS figures released last year showed that 10.9 percent (or 6.7 million) of the currently resident population of Britain were not born in this country.
In 2005, the ONS issued a separate report which said that 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British.”
This 2005 birth rate figure does not include births to second and third generation immigrant mothers.
Figures released by the ONS in January 2009 revealed that the Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years. Their population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society.
An August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.
The majority of the “new immigrants” are not from Eastern Europe, as is often widely claimed. According to the ONS figures, immigrants from Eastern Europe had 25,000 children in Britain last year — an absolute minority of the just over 700,000 live births.
Once again, the statistical evidence is clear: unless immigration is not only halted but reversed, it will just be a question of time before Britain is overrun by an invasion via the womb.
Only the British National Party dares to point this truth out, and only the BNP has the sensible, humane and just policies to avoid Britain turning into a cross between India and Nigeria.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)